{"id":15700,"date":"2014-09-24T08:00:51","date_gmt":"2014-09-24T12:00:51","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/retrofitmagazine.com\/?p=15700"},"modified":"2014-09-23T18:42:53","modified_gmt":"2014-09-23T22:42:53","slug":"ashrae-proposes-alternate-compliance-path-iaq-standard-open-public-comment","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/retrofitmagazine.com\/ashrae-proposes-alternate-compliance-path-iaq-standard-open-public-comment\/","title":{"rendered":"ASHRAE Proposes Alternate Compliance Path for IAQ Standard, Open for Public Comment"},"content":{"rendered":"

Recognizing that the ventilation rate procedure in its indoor air quality standard may be difficult to apply in existing buildings, ASHRAE<\/a> is proposing an alternate compliance path.<\/p>\n

Proposed addendum b is one of six addenda to ANSI\/ASHRAE Standard 62.1-2013, Ventilation for Acceptable Indoor Air Quality currently open for public comment<\/a> from Sept. 5 to Oct. 5, 2014. <\/p>\n

Responding to increasing interest in sustainability in existing buildings, Standard 62.1 is cited frequently as a criterion for evaluating ventilation systems in existing buildings. Examples include LEED-EBOM, ENERGY STAR and bEQ. Some building categories, such as K-12 schools and office buildings, are frequently renovated and often have multiple zone systems that provide HVAC to similar space types.<\/p>\n

Section 6 (including the ventilation rate procedure) of the standard was developed as a design standard. As such, Section 6 and Normative Appendix A have the complexity to allow for many complex system designs and airflow pathways. The scope of the standard states in part that \u201cthe provisions of this standard are not intended to be applied retroactively when the standard is used as a mandatory regulation or code.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cFor existing buildings, it may be difficult to apply the ventilation rate procedure (VRP), particularly for buildings with multiple-zone recirculating ventilation systems,\u201d Roger Hedrick, chair of the Standard 62.1 committee, said. \u201cThis is because determination of some of the values needed to calculate ventilation rates may be difficult or impossible because required information is not available. An example is system ventilation efficiency (Ev), used in equation 6.2.5.4.\u201d<\/p>\n

Proposed addendum b provides an alternate path of compliance that is needed by the marketplace for those situations where information required to determine system performance is unavailable or for smaller facilities with straightforward multiple zone applications, he said.<\/p>\n

Also open for public comment is proposed addendum c, which would revise the current definition of environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) to include emissions from electronic smoking devices and from smoking of cannabis (now allowed by some jurisdictions). The existing requirements for separation of ETS-free spaces from ETS spaces remain unchanged. The proposed addendum also would clarify that provision of acceptable indoor air quality is incompatible with the presence of ETS, including cannabis smoke and e-cigarette emissions.<\/p>\n

Other addenda open for public comment from Sept. 5 to Oct. 5, 2014, are:<\/p>\n